Submitted articles are primarily evaluated for any methodological flaws, format, and their compliance with the Journal’s instructions. Through a double-blind review, the articles will be reviewed by at least two external (peer) reviewers. Their comments will be passed to the authors and their responses to the comments along with the reviewers’ comments will then be evaluated by the Editor-in-Chief. The final review process will be discussed in regular editorial board sessions and on the basis of the comments, and the Journal’s standards, the Editor-in-Chief will decide which articles should be published.

It should be noted that articles submitted by the staff and editors of the CBJ will also be subjected to peer review, and the authors will be completely blind to the evaluation process of their article until a final decision has been made.